Title |
Increased habitat fragmentation leads to isolation among and low genetic diversity within populations of the imperiled Kentucky Arrow Darter (Etheostoma sagitta spilotum)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Conservation Genetics, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10592-019-01188-y |
Authors |
Rebecca E. Blanton, Mollie F. Cashner, Matthew R. Thomas, Stephanie L. Brandt, Michael A. Floyd |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 20% |
Researcher | 3 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
Librarian | 2 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 40% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2019.
All research outputs
#5,751,025
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#331
of 1,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,677
of 349,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#13
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.