Title |
African Orphan Crops Consortium (AOCC): status of developing genomic resources for African orphan crops
|
---|---|
Published in |
Planta, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00425-019-03156-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Prasad S. Hendre, Samuel Muthemba, Robert Kariba, Alice Muchugi, Yuan Fu, Yue Chang, Bo Song, Huan Liu, Min Liu, Xuezhu Liao, Sunil Kumar Sahu, Sibo Wang, Linzhou Li, Haorong Lu, Shufeng Peng, Shifeng Cheng, Xun Xu, Huanming Yang, Jian Wang, Xin Liu, Anthony Simons, Howard-Yana Shapiro, Rita H. Mumm, Allen Van Deynze, Ramni Jamnadass |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
China | 2 | 33% |
Germany | 1 | 17% |
Kenya | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 157 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 23 | 15% |
Researcher | 20 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 5% |
Lecturer | 7 | 4% |
Other | 24 | 15% |
Unknown | 64 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 29% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Other | 21 | 13% |
Unknown | 66 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,414,047
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#64
of 2,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,530
of 350,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#4
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,745 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.