| Title |
Accurate and efficient amino acid analysis for protein quantification using hydrophilic interaction chromatography coupled tandem mass spectrometry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-019-0430-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shrikaar Kambhampati, Jia Li, Bradley S. Evans, Doug K. Allen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| Mexico | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 225 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 80 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 25 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 14% |
| Unknown | 89 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2022.
All research outputs
#12,756,718
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#551
of 1,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,623
of 349,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#15
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.