↓ Skip to main content

Reusable model transformations

Overview of attention for article published in Software and Systems Modeling, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Reusable model transformations
Published in
Software and Systems Modeling, November 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10270-010-0181-9
Authors

Sagar Sen, Naouel Moha, Vincent Mahé, Olivier Barais, Benoit Baudry, Jean-Marc Jézéquel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 4%
Hungary 2 4%
France 2 4%
China 1 2%
Unknown 46 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 36%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 15%
Student > Master 8 15%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 50 94%
Engineering 2 4%
Chemistry 1 2%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2016.
All research outputs
#19,246,640
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Software and Systems Modeling
#444
of 721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,124
of 103,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Software and Systems Modeling
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 721 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.