↓ Skip to main content

Is it time to share paediatric guideline development?

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Is it time to share paediatric guideline development?
Published in
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40368-016-0225-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Clarkson, J. Farnham

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2016.
All research outputs
#20,311,744
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
#237
of 282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,307
of 297,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 282 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.