↓ Skip to main content

Disturbance Decouples Biogeochemical Cycles Across Forests of the Southeastern US

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Disturbance Decouples Biogeochemical Cycles Across Forests of the Southeastern US
Published in
Ecosystems, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10021-015-9917-2
Authors

Ashley D. Keiser, Jennifer D. Knoepp, Mark A. Bradford

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 28 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 5%
Unknown 17 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,984,354
of 24,323,543 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#1,013
of 1,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,648
of 272,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#18
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,323,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.