↓ Skip to main content

Anterior shoulder stabilization by Bristow–Latarjet procedure in athletes: return-to-sport and functional outcomes at minimum 2-year follow-up

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Anterior shoulder stabilization by Bristow–Latarjet procedure in athletes: return-to-sport and functional outcomes at minimum 2-year follow-up
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00590-016-1751-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean Sébastien Beranger, Shahnaz Klouche, Thomas Bauer, Thomas Demoures, Philippe Hardy

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess return-to-sport outcomes following the Latarjet-Bristow procedure. This retrospective study included all athletes <50 years old, who underwent a Latarjet-Bristow procedure for anterior shoulder instability in 2009-2012. Main criteria assessments were the number of athletes returning to any sport and the number returning to the same sport at their preinjury level. The main follow-up was 46.8 ± 9.7 months. Forty-seven patients were analyzed, 46 men/1 women, mean age 27.9 ± 7.9 years. Eighteen patients practiced competitive sports and 29 recreational sports. None of them were professional athletes. One hundred percent returned to sports after a mean 6.3 ± 4.3 months. Thirty/47 (63.8 %) patients returned to the same sport at the same level at least and 10/47 (21.3 %) patients changed sport because of their shoulder. Compared to patients who returned to the same sport at the same level, patients who changed sports or returned to a lower level had practiced overhead or forced overhead sports [OR = 4.7 (1.3-16.9), p = 0.02] before surgery, experienced avoidance behavior at the final follow-up (p = 0.002), apprehension (p = 0.00001) and had a worse Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index score and sub-items (p = 0.003) except for daily activities (p = 0.21). At the final follow-up, 45/47 (95.7 %) patients were still practicing a sport. All the patients returned to sports, most to their preinjury sport at the same level. Patients who practiced an overhead sport were more likely to play at a lower level or to change sport postoperatively. IV, retrospective study-Case series with no comparison group.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 17%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Other 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Sports and Recreations 5 7%
Psychology 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 24 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2016.
All research outputs
#20,311,744
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#541
of 877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,968
of 298,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 877 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.