↓ Skip to main content

Interspecific differences in cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of Myrmica ants are sufficiently consistent to explain host specificity by Maculinea (large blue) butterflies

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, February 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Interspecific differences in cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of Myrmica ants are sufficiently consistent to explain host specificity by Maculinea (large blue) butterflies
Published in
Oecologia, February 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00442-001-0857-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Elmes, T. Akino, J. Thomas, R. Clarke, J. Knapp

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Papua New Guinea 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 96 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 26%
Researcher 21 20%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 8 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 75%
Environmental Science 10 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Physics and Astronomy 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 10 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,693
of 5,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,094
of 136,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#6
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.