| Title |
Microbial utilization of rice root exudates: 13C labeling and PLFA composition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology and Fertility of Soils, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00374-016-1101-0 |
| Authors |
Hongzhao Yuan, Zhenke Zhu, Shoulong Liu, Tida Ge, Hongzhen Jing, Baozhen Li, Qiong Liu, Tin Mar Lynn, Jinshui Wu, Yakov Kuzyakov |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 110 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 34% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 32 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 42 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2016.
All research outputs
#4,415,538
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Biology and Fertility of Soils
#69
of 578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,679
of 300,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology and Fertility of Soils
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them