↓ Skip to main content

Denitrifying sulfide removal process on high-salinity wastewaters in the presence of Halomonas sp.

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Denitrifying sulfide removal process on high-salinity wastewaters in the presence of Halomonas sp.
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00253-015-7039-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chunshuang Liu, Dongfeng Zhao, Wenjuan Ma, Yadong Guo, Aijie Wang, Qilin Wang, Duu-Jong Lee

Abstract

Biological conversion of sulfide, acetate, and nitrate to, respectively, elemental sulfur (S(0)), carbon dioxide, and nitrogen-containing gas (such as N2) at NaCl concentration of 35-70 g/L was achieved in an expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactor. A C/N ratio of 1:1 was noted to achieve high sulfide removal and S(0) conversion rate at high salinity. The extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) quantities were increased with NaCl concentration, being 11.4-mg/g volatile-suspended solids at 70 mg/L NaCl. The denitrifying sulfide removal (DSR) consortium incorporated Thauera sp. and Halomonas sp. as the heterotrophs and Azoarcus sp. being the autotrophs at high salinity condition. Halomonas sp. correlates with the enhanced DSR performance at high salinity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 20%
Other 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 7 20%
Unknown 13 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 15 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,480,940
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2,515
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,946
of 282,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#29
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.