You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Peripheral trauma and risk of dystonia: What are the evidences and potential co-risk factors from a population insurance database?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0216772 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonella Macerollo, Mark J. Edwards, Hui-Chun Huang, Ming-Kuei Lu, Hsuan-Ju Chen, Chon-Haw Tsai, Jui Cheng Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 23 | 66% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2019.
All research outputs
#14,449,295
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#119,454
of 197,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,347
of 350,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,669
of 2,778 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,778 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.