You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The wisdom of partisan crowds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1817195116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joshua Becker, Ethan Porter, Damon Centola |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 23% |
| Japan | 10 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 8% |
| Denmark | 3 | 4% |
| Austria | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 30 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 51% |
| Scientists | 33 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 164 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 21% |
| Researcher | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 19% |
| Unknown | 35 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 42 | 26% |
| Psychology | 28 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 18% |
| Unknown | 41 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 152. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#273,988
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#5,058
of 103,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,584
of 365,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#100
of 949 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 949 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.