↓ Skip to main content

The relationship between testosterone and long-distance calling in wild male chimpanzees

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
The relationship between testosterone and long-distance calling in wild male chimpanzees
Published in
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00265-016-2087-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pawel Fedurek, Katie E. Slocombe, Drew K. Enigk, Melissa Emery Thompson, Richard W. Wrangham, Martin N. Muller

Abstract

Long-distance calling is a common behaviour in animals that has various important social functions. At a physiological level, calling is often mediated by gonadal hormones such as testosterone (T), particularly when its function is linked to intra-sexual competition for mates or territory. T also plays an important role in the development of vocal characteristics associated with dominance in humans. However, the few available studies of T and vocal behaviour in non-human primates suggest that in primates T has less influence on call production than in other animals. We tested this hypothesis by studying the relationship between T concentrations and pant hooting in wild male chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) of the Kanyawara community in the Kibale National Park, Uganda. We found three kinds of correlation. Hourly T averages were positively associated with hourly rates of pant-hooting. Monthly T levels were likewise correlated with monthly rates of pant hooting after controlling for other influences such as fission-fusion rates. Finally, males with high T levels had higher peak frequency at the start of the call climax. These results suggest that T affects the production of pant-hoots in chimpanzees. This implies that the pant-hoot call plays a role in male-male competition. We propose that even in cognitively sophisticated species, endocrine mechanisms can contribute to regulating vocal production.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 29%
Student > Master 8 12%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 15 22%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 46%
Psychology 8 12%
Environmental Science 4 6%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 13 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2016.
All research outputs
#6,090,169
of 24,364,603 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#980
of 3,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,264
of 303,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#24
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,364,603 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.