You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does the use of standing ‘hot’ desks change sedentary work time in an open plan office?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Preventive Medicine, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.10.012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicholas D. Gilson, Alessandro Suppini, Gemma C. Ryde, Helen E. Brown, Wendy J. Brown |
| Abstract |
This study assessed the use of standing 'hot' desks in an open plan office and their impact on sedentary work time. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 3% |
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Austria | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 157 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 38 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 18% |
| Researcher | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 37 | 21% |
| Unknown | 17 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 15% |
| Sports and Recreations | 26 | 15% |
| Psychology | 17 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 9% |
| Engineering | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 49 | 28% |
| Unknown | 27 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,999,457
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Preventive Medicine
#2,475
of 5,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,960
of 153,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Preventive Medicine
#18
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.