↓ Skip to main content

c-ABL modulates MAP kinases activation downstream of VEGFR-2 signaling by direct phosphorylation of the adaptor proteins GRB2 and NCK1

Overview of attention for article published in Angiogenesis, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
c-ABL modulates MAP kinases activation downstream of VEGFR-2 signaling by direct phosphorylation of the adaptor proteins GRB2 and NCK1
Published in
Angiogenesis, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10456-012-9252-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca Anselmi, Maurizio Orlandini, Marina Rocchigiani, Caterina De Clemente, Ahmad Salameh, Claudia Lentucci, Salvatore Oliviero, Federico Galvagni

Abstract

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A (VEGF-A) is a key molecule in normal and tumor angiogenesis. This study addresses the role of c-ABL as a novel downstream target of VEGF-A in primary Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVEC). On the basis of immunoprecipitation experiments, in vitro kinase assay and RNA interference, we demonstrate that VEGF-A induces the c-ABL kinase activity through the VEGF Receptor-2/Phosphatidylinositol-3-Kinase pathway. By treating HUVEC with the specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571 and over-expressing a dominant negative c-ABL mutant, we show that the VEGF-A-activated c-ABL reduces the amplitude of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases (ERK1/2, JNKs and p38) activation in a dose-dependent manner by a negative feedback mechanism. By analysis of the adaptor proteins NCK1 and GRB2 mutants we further show that the negative loop on p38 is mediated by c-ABL phosphorylation at tyrosine 105 of the adaptor protein NCK1, while the phosphorylation at tyrosine 209 of GRB2 down-modulates ERK1/2 and JNKs signaling. These findings suggest that c-ABL function is to establish a correct and tightly controlled response of endothelial cells to VEGF-A during the angiogenic process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
India 1 3%
Slovenia 1 3%
Unknown 35 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 24%
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Computer Science 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 5 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2012.
All research outputs
#20,155,513
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Angiogenesis
#439
of 536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,276
of 249,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Angiogenesis
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.