↓ Skip to main content

Who Gives and Who Gets: Why, When, and with Whom Young People Engage in Oral Sex

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Who Gives and Who Gets: Why, When, and with Whom Young People Engage in Oral Sex
Published in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10964-012-9745-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah A. Vannier, Lucia F. O’Sullivan

Abstract

Surprisingly little is known about oral sex experiences among emerging adults, including the motives behind their participation in this sexual activity. The current study examined the characteristics of emerging adults' most recent oral sex experience. A total of 431 young people (M age = 21.7 years; 71.7% female) completed an on-line survey assessing their sexual history, context (partner type, co-occurring sexual behaviors), and motives (physical, emotional, goal attainment, and insecurity) for engaging in their most recent heterosexual oral sex interaction. The majority of oral sex encounters occurred within the context of a committed relationship and during an interaction that also included intercourse. Cunnilingus was rare unless reciprocated with fellatio. Overall, both males' and females' reports indicate that they were motivated to engage in oral sex by sexual desire and attraction to their partner, or to enhance an emotional connection with their partner. Insecurity and goal attainment motives were uncommon. Males reported more physical motives than did females, and females reported more emotional and insecurity motives than did males. The findings provide insights into youths' oral sex experiences, and make clear how essential it is to understand the broader sexual and partnership context in which a given sexual activity occurs. These findings have implications for policies aimed at the development of effective sexual health education programs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 19%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 36%
Social Sciences 17 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 17 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2015.
All research outputs
#6,488,780
of 25,173,778 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#682
of 1,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,047
of 261,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,173,778 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.