↓ Skip to main content

Are Mixed-Gender Committees Less Biased Toward Female and Male Candidates? An Investigation of Competence-, Morality-, and Sociability-Related Terms in Performance Appraisal

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Language and Social Psychology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are Mixed-Gender Committees Less Biased Toward Female and Male Candidates? An Investigation of Competence-, Morality-, and Sociability-Related Terms in Performance Appraisal
Published in
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, April 2019
DOI 10.1177/0261927x19844808
Authors

Francesca Prati, Michela Menegatti, Silvia Moscatelli, Corine Stella Kana Kenfack, Sara Pireddu, Elisabetta Crocetti, Marco Giovanni Mariani, Monica Rubini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Lecturer 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 27%
Social Sciences 4 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 10%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 8 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2019.
All research outputs
#15,545,430
of 23,864,146 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Language and Social Psychology
#291
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,560
of 352,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Language and Social Psychology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,864,146 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them