↓ Skip to main content

The suprachiasmatic nucleus: age-related decline in biological rhythms

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Physiological Sciences, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 319)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
The suprachiasmatic nucleus: age-related decline in biological rhythms
Published in
The Journal of Physiological Sciences, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12576-016-0439-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takahiro J. Nakamura, Nana N. Takasu, Wataru Nakamura

Abstract

Aging is associated with changes in sleep duration and quality, as well as increased rates of pathologic/disordered sleep. While several factors contribute to these changes, emerging research suggests that age-related changes in the mammalian central circadian clock within the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) may be a key factor. Prior work from our group suggests that circadian output from the SCN declines because of aging. Furthermore, we have previously observed age-related infertility in female mice, caused by a mismatch between environmental light-dark cycles and the intrinsic, internal biological clocks. In this review, we address regulatory mechanisms underlying circadian rhythms in mammals and summarize recent literature describing the effects of aging on the circadian system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 76 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 21%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 12%
Neuroscience 8 10%
Psychology 6 8%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 23 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2023.
All research outputs
#648,791
of 24,387,992 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Physiological Sciences
#8
of 319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,631
of 303,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Physiological Sciences
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,387,992 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.