| Title |
The classification of feeding and eating disorders in the ICD-11: results of a field study comparing proposed ICD-11 guidelines with existing ICD-10 guidelines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-019-1327-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Angélica M. Claudino, Kathleen M. Pike, Phillipa Hay, Jared W. Keeley, Spencer C. Evans, Tahilia J. Rebello, Rachel Bryant-Waugh, Yunfei Dai, Min Zhao, Chihiro Matsumoto, Cecile Rausch Herscovici, Blanca Mellor-Marsá, Anne-Claire Stona, Cary S. Kogan, Howard F. Andrews, Palmiero Monteleone, David Joseph Pilon, Cornelia Thiels, Pratap Sharan, Samir Al-Adawi, Geoffrey M. Reed |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Norway | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 253 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 12% |
| Researcher | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 19% |
| Unknown | 91 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 38 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 13% |
| Unknown | 101 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,402,615
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#983
of 3,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,830
of 352,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#19
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.