Title |
Effect of combination of dietary fish protein and fish oil on lipid metabolism in rats
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Food Science and Technology, March 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13197-011-0343-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ryota Hosomi, Kenji Fukunaga, Hirofumi Arai, Seiji Kanda, Toshimasa Nishiyama, Munehiro Yoshida |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 15% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 15% |
Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 20% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 15% |
Chemistry | 2 | 10% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 15% |
Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2016.
All research outputs
#6,545,898
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Food Science and Technology
#349
of 1,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,526
of 125,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Food Science and Technology
#12
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,658 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.