Title |
Patterns of fragmentation and identification of possible corridors in North Western Ghats
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, December 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12524-010-0043-5 |
Authors |
M. P. Kale, G. Talukdar, R. K. Panigrahy, S. Singh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 23% |
Professor | 6 | 13% |
Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 11% |
Researcher | 5 | 11% |
Other | 8 | 17% |
Unknown | 7 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 17 | 36% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 32% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 11 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2016.
All research outputs
#3,283,299
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing
#8
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,340
of 181,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them