You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of Vedolizumab in Patients With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.05.013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kate D. Lynch, Roger W. Chapman, Satish Keshav, Aldo J. Montano-Loza, Andrew L. Mason, Andreas E. Kremer, Marcel Vetter, Manon de Krijger, Cyriel Y. Ponsioen, Palak Trivedi, Gideon Hirschfield, Christoph Schramm, Chung Heng Liu, Christopher L. Bowlus, Derek J. Estes, Daniel Pratt, Charlotte Hedin, Annika Bergquist, Annemarie C. de Vries, C. Janneke van der Woude, Lei Yu, David N. Assis, James Boyer, Henriette Ytting, Emina Hallibasic, Michael Trauner, Hanns-Ulrich Marschall, Luigi M. Daretti, Marco Marzioni, Kidist K. Yimam, Nicola Perin, Annarosa Floreani, Benedetta Terziroli Beretta-Piccoli, Jennifer K. Rogers, International Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Study Group, Cynthia Levy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 31% |
| Canada | 2 | 13% |
| Spain | 2 | 13% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 33 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 43% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 36 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,607,891
of 25,505,015 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
#1,535
of 4,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,567
of 365,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
#48
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,505,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.