Title |
Cannabis in Asia: its center of origin and early cultivation, based on a synthesis of subfossil pollen and archaeobotanical studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00334-019-00731-8 |
Authors |
John M. McPartland, William Hegman, Tengwen Long |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 20 | 24% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
Canada | 3 | 4% |
Mexico | 2 | 2% |
France | 2 | 2% |
Portugal | 2 | 2% |
Australia | 2 | 2% |
Peru | 2 | 2% |
Spain | 2 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 42 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 73 | 86% |
Scientists | 7 | 8% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 175 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 27 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 26 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 10% |
Researcher | 12 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 5% |
Other | 21 | 12% |
Unknown | 63 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 26% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 3% |
Chemistry | 5 | 3% |
Other | 29 | 17% |
Unknown | 62 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 213. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#181,592
of 25,374,374 outputs
Outputs from Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
#3
of 456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,624
of 358,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 456 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.