| Title |
The expanding spectrum of modes of transmission of Zika virus: a global concern
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12941-016-0128-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alfonso J. Rodriguez-Morales, Antonio Carlos Bandeira, Carlos Franco-Paredes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 15% |
| France | 5 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
| Japan | 3 | 4% |
| Brazil | 3 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 37 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 57 | 72% |
| Scientists | 12 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 164 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 48 | 28% |
| Unknown | 15 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 38 | 22% |
| Unknown | 28 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2017.
All research outputs
#622,893
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#8
of 682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,912
of 313,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.