↓ Skip to main content

Virtual reality exposure therapy as treatment for pain catastrophizing in fibromyalgia patients: proof-of-concept study (Study Protocol)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
Title
Virtual reality exposure therapy as treatment for pain catastrophizing in fibromyalgia patients: proof-of-concept study (Study Protocol)
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-12-85
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linzette D Morris, Karen A Grimmer-Somers, Bruce Spottiswoode, Quinette A Louw

Abstract

Albeit exercise is currently advocated as one of the most effective management strategies for fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS); the implementation of exercise as a FMS treatment in reality is significantly hampered by patients' poor compliance. The inference that pain catastrophizing is a key predictor of poor compliance in FMS patients, justifies considering the alteration of pain catastrophizing in improving compliance towards exercises in FMS patients. The aim of this study is to provide proof-of-concept for the development and testing of a novel virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) program as treatment for exercise-related pain catastrophizing in FMS patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 272 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 14%
Student > Bachelor 32 11%
Researcher 26 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 8%
Other 57 20%
Unknown 59 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 21%
Psychology 55 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 14%
Neuroscience 15 5%
Computer Science 11 4%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 74 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2015.
All research outputs
#17,655,675
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,877
of 4,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,606
of 109,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#24
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.