↓ Skip to main content

Formaldehyde Stress Responses in Bacterial Pathogens

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Formaldehyde Stress Responses in Bacterial Pathogens
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00257
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathan H. Chen, Karrera Y. Djoko, Frédéric J. Veyrier, Alastair G. McEwan

Abstract

Formaldehyde is the simplest of all aldehydes and is highly cytotoxic. Its use and associated dangers from environmental exposure have been well documented. Detoxification systems for formaldehyde are found throughout the biological world and they are especially important in methylotrophic bacteria, which generate this compound as part of their metabolism of methanol. Formaldehyde metabolizing systems can be divided into those dependent upon pterin cofactors, sugar phosphates and those dependent upon glutathione. The more prevalent thiol-dependent formaldehyde detoxification system is found in many bacterial pathogens, almost all of which do not metabolize methane or methanol. This review describes the endogenous and exogenous sources of formaldehyde, its toxic effects and mechanisms of detoxification. The methods of formaldehyde sensing are also described with a focus on the formaldehyde responsive transcription factors HxlR, FrmR, and NmlR. Finally, the physiological relevance of detoxification systems for formaldehyde in bacterial pathogens is discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 187 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 16%
Student > Master 28 15%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 50 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 13%
Chemistry 18 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 4%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 57 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,583,540
of 24,896,578 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#7,664
of 28,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,430
of 304,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#192
of 517 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,896,578 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 517 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.