You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The rise of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in international development in historical perspective
|
---|---|
Published in |
Theory and Society, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11186-019-09352-6 |
Authors |
Luciana de Souza Leão, Gil Eyal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 137 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 35 | 26% |
United Kingdom | 12 | 9% |
Brazil | 3 | 2% |
France | 3 | 2% |
Australia | 2 | 1% |
Djibouti | 2 | 1% |
Germany | 2 | 1% |
Denmark | 2 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Other | 7 | 5% |
Unknown | 68 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 67 | 49% |
Scientists | 63 | 46% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 16 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
Researcher | 11 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
Other | 21 | 22% |
Unknown | 21 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 39 | 41% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 15 | 16% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Unknown | 24 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#475,246
of 25,552,205 outputs
Outputs from Theory and Society
#7
of 492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,256
of 365,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theory and Society
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.