↓ Skip to main content

A multilevel model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus acquisition within the hierarchy of an Australian tertiary hospital

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Infection Control, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A multilevel model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus acquisition within the hierarchy of an Australian tertiary hospital
Published in
American Journal of Infection Control, February 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.10.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona Kong, David L. Paterson, Michael Coory, Archie C.A. Clements

Abstract

Hospitals without universal single room accommodations typically contain multibed cubicles within wards. In this study, we examined whether the variation in a patient's risk for acquiring methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a major tertiary hospital was greatest at the bed, cubicle, or ward level, and quantified the risk of MRSA acquisition associated with exposure to MRSA-colonized/infected patients within the same bed, cubicle, and ward at differently distributed lag times. Nested tri-level hierarchical logistic regression models with random effects were used for non-multiresistant MRSA (nmMRSA) and multiresistant MRSA (mMRSA). The models were internally validated. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare the models' predictive capability The odds of new nmMRSA acquisition were 6.06-fold (95% credible intervals [CrI], 3.93- to 9.34-fold) greater in bed-weeks when a nmMRSA-colonized/infected patient was in the same cubicle 2 weeks earlier. The odds of mMRSA acquisition were 5.12-fold (95% CrI, 4.02- to 6.51-fold) greater in bed-weeks when a colonized/infected patient was in the same ward 2 weeks earlier. The between-cluster variance was highest at the ward level. Patients were at greater risk if there was a colonized/infected patient in the same cubicle or ward 2 weeks earlier. Our findings indicate that focusing on the relevant cubicles and wards during this high-risk period can help target infection control resources more efficiently.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 28 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 19%
Environmental Science 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 8 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2012.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Infection Control
#3,328
of 4,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,665
of 258,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Infection Control
#35
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.