↓ Skip to main content

An evidence-based scale for the antecedents of depressive symptoms in Australian adults

Overview of attention for article published in Australasian Psychiatry, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An evidence-based scale for the antecedents of depressive symptoms in Australian adults
Published in
Australasian Psychiatry, July 2016
DOI 10.1177/1039856216629842
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xin Liu, Luis Furuya-Kanamori, Dan Siskind, David Crompton, Gail M Williams, Karam Kostner, Luis Vitetta, Suhail A Doi

Abstract

To develop and test a self-reported scale designed to measure the antecedents of depression. Participants of the Sustainable Mastery of Innovative Lifelong Exercise (SMILE) Tai Chi program were invited to complete the scale for antecedents of depressive symptoms. The scale included questions regarding events/factors the participants have experienced over the past three months and preceded their depressive symptoms. The reliability of the questions was assessed using the Cronbach's alpha. Principal components analysis was used to examine if there were domains of interest across the scale questions. A total of 126 participants completed the scale. The scale had a good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.82). Principal components analysis identified three components (life events, psychosocial problems, and physical/health problems) in the scale and the components detected the root categories of depression in more than 56% of the cases. This simple self-administered scale has proven to provide a reliable measure for the antecedent factors of depression in the SMILE Tai Chi cohort; further validation of the scale in different settings is encouraged.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 10 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 19%
Psychology 6 16%
Sports and Recreations 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2016.
All research outputs
#4,185,029
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from Australasian Psychiatry
#175
of 1,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,618
of 354,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australasian Psychiatry
#10
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,429 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.