↓ Skip to main content

Clinical utilization of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cells (CAR-T) in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)–an expert opinion from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT…

Overview of attention for article published in Bone Marrow Transplantation, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
40 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical utilization of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cells (CAR-T) in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)–an expert opinion from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (ASBMT)
Published in
Bone Marrow Transplantation, May 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41409-019-0451-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ankit J. Kansagra, Noelle V. Frey, Merav Bar, Theodore W. Laetsch, Paul A. Carpenter, Bipin N. Savani, Helen E. Heslop, Catherine M. Bollard, Krishna V. Komanduri, Dennis A. Gastineau, Christian Chabannon, Miguel A. Perales, Michael Hudecek, Mahmoud Aljurf, Leslie Andritsos, John A. Barrett, Veronika Bachanova, Chiara Bonini, Armin Ghobadi, Saar I. Gill, Joshua A. Hill, Saad Kenderian, Partow Kebriaei, Arnon Nagler, David Maloney, Hien D. Liu, Nirali N. Shah, Mohamed A. Kharfan-Dabaja, Elizabeth J. Shpall, Ghulam J. Mufti, Laura Johnston, Elad Jacoby, Ali Bazarbachi, John F. DiPersio, Steven Z. Pavletic, David L. Porter, Stephan A. Grupp, Michel Sadelain, Mark R. Litzow, Mohamad Mohty, Shahrukh K. Hashmi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 17%
Other 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 28 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,154,614
of 25,071,270 outputs
Outputs from Bone Marrow Transplantation
#53
of 4,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,810
of 357,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bone Marrow Transplantation
#5
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,071,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.