You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chimpanzee extractive foraging with excavating tools: Experimental modeling of the origins of human technology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0215644 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alba Motes-Rodrigo, Parandis Majlesi, Travis Rayne Pickering, Matthias Laska, Helene Axelsen, Tanya C. Minchin, Claudio Tennie, R. Adriana Hernandez-Aguilar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 5 | 12% |
| United States | 3 | 7% |
| Spain | 3 | 7% |
| Argentina | 3 | 7% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 81% |
| Scientists | 5 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 20% |
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 12% |
| Psychology | 5 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 155. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2022.
All research outputs
#245,417
of 24,217,496 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#3,571
of 208,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,226
of 355,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#68
of 2,774 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,774 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.