↓ Skip to main content

Preschool Deployment of Evidence-Based Social Communication Intervention: JASPER in the Classroom

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
Title
Preschool Deployment of Evidence-Based Social Communication Intervention: JASPER in the Classroom
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10803-016-2752-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ya-Chih Chang, Stephanie Y. Shire, Wendy Shih, Carolyn Gelfand, Connie Kasari

Abstract

Few research-developed early intervention models have been deployed to and tested in real world preschool programs. In this study, teaching staff implemented a social communication modularized intervention, JASPER, in their daily program. Sixty-six preschool children with autism in twelve classrooms (12 teachers) were randomized to receive immediate JASPER training (IT) or were waitlisted (WL) for 3 months with a 1-month follow up. Measures of core deficits (initiations of joint engagement, joint attention gestures and language, play skills) and standardized cognitive measures were improved for IT over WL children. IT teachers achieved and maintained high fidelity. Teachers can implement evidence-based interventions with significant improvements in core deficits of their children with ASD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 262 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 12%
Researcher 29 11%
Student > Bachelor 29 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 8%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 76 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 70 26%
Social Sciences 27 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 9%
Arts and Humanities 8 3%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 88 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,412,340
of 24,620,470 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,466
of 5,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,143
of 303,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#27
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,620,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.