You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The cost‐effectiveness of universal late‐pregnancy screening for macrosomia in nulliparous women: a decision analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1471-0528.15809 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D Wastlund, AA Moraitis, JG Thornton, J Sanders, IR White, P Brocklehurst, GCS Smith, ECF Wilson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 41% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 68% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 20% |
| Unknown | 26 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,037,683
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#794
of 6,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,493
of 366,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#16
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.