↓ Skip to main content

Local bacteria affect the efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
215 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Local bacteria affect the efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs
Published in
Scientific Reports, September 2015
DOI 10.1038/srep14554
Pubmed ID
Authors

Panos Lehouritis, Joanne Cummins, Michael Stanton, Carola T. Murphy, Florence O. McCarthy, Gregor Reid, Camilla Urbaniak, William L. Byrne, Mark Tangney

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 238 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 16%
Researcher 33 14%
Student > Bachelor 33 14%
Student > Master 26 11%
Other 14 6%
Other 41 17%
Unknown 58 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 8%
Chemistry 7 3%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 67 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,436,707
of 25,494,370 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#29,480
of 141,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,454
of 286,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#470
of 2,304 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,494,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,304 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.