↓ Skip to main content

Bilaterian-like promoters in the highly compact Amphimedon queenslandica genome

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bilaterian-like promoters in the highly compact Amphimedon queenslandica genome
Published in
Scientific Reports, March 2016
DOI 10.1038/srep22496
Pubmed ID
Authors

Selene L. Fernandez-Valverde, Bernard M. Degnan

Abstract

The regulatory systems underlying animal development must have evolved prior to the emergence of eumetazoans (cnidarians and bilaterians). Although representatives of earlier-branching animals - sponges ctenophores and placozoans - possess most of the developmental transcription factor families present in eumetazoans, the DNA regulatory elements that these transcription factors target remain uncharted. Here we characterise the core promoter sequences, U1 snRNP-binding sites (5' splice sites; 5'SSs) and polyadenylation sites (PASs) in the sponge Amphimedon queenslandica. Similar to unicellular opisthokonts, Amphimedon's genes are tightly packed in the genome and have small introns. In contrast, its genes possess metazoan-like core promoters populated with binding motifs previously deemed to be specific to vertebrates, including Nrf-1 and Krüppel-like elements. Also as in vertebrates, Amphimedon's PASs and 5'SSs are depleted downstream and upstream of transcription start sites, respectively, consistent with non-elongating transcripts being short-lived; PASs and 5'SSs are more evenly distributed in bidirectional promoters in Amphimedon. The presence of bilaterian-like regulatory DNAs in sponges is consistent with these being early and essential innovations of the metazoan gene regulatory repertoire.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 41 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 24%
Student > Bachelor 10 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 36%
Materials Science 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2021.
All research outputs
#4,249,447
of 25,468,789 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#34,114
of 141,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,468
of 313,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#879
of 3,464 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,468,789 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141,203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,464 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.