| Title |
Overview of the second super-resolution microscopy session of the joint Asian Biophysics Association/Australian Society for Biophysics meeting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biophysical Reviews, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12551-019-00549-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Donna R. Whelan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2019.
All research outputs
#18,020,520
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Reviews
#385
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,267
of 351,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Reviews
#15
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.