↓ Skip to main content

Reduced Expression of Both Syncytin 1 and Syncytin 2 Correlates With Severity of Preeclampsia

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Sciences, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 1,200)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Reduced Expression of Both Syncytin 1 and Syncytin 2 Correlates With Severity of Preeclampsia
Published in
Reproductive Sciences, December 2011
DOI 10.1177/1933719111404608
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amandine Vargas, Chirine Toufaily, Frédérique LeBellego, Éric Rassart, Julie Lafond, Benoit Barbeau

Abstract

Human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) represent up to 8% of the human genome and express several of its genes in the placenta. Studies have demonstrated that HERV envelope proteins syncytins 1 and 2 play a crucial role in trophoblast fusion and placenta development. Here, we compared the levels of placental expression of syncytins with the severity of preeclampsia (PE) symptoms. Confocal microscopy experiments indicated a pronounced deficiency in cellular fusion in trophoblast cells from patients with PE when compared to controls. As determined by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and Western blot analyses, syncytin mRNA and protein levels were decreased in PE placentas versus controls. Interestingly, syncytin 2 levels were more importantly impaired than syncytin 1. Our results further highlighted the existence of a correlation between the extent of the decrease in the expression levels of both fusogenic proteins and the degree of severity of PE symptoms. These HERV proteins could thereby be used as potential markers for the early diagnosis of PE.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 91 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 17%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 16 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,846,238
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Sciences
#45
of 1,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,126
of 243,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Sciences
#3
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,200 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.