↓ Skip to main content

Excipient selection for thermally stable enveloped and non-enveloped viral vaccine platforms in dry powders

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Pharmaceutics, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Excipient selection for thermally stable enveloped and non-enveloped viral vaccine platforms in dry powders
Published in
International Journal of Pharmaceutics, February 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.02.035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven P Toniolo, Sam Afkhami, Ahmad Mahmood, Cécile Fradin, Brian D Lichty, Matthew S Miller, Zhou Xing, Emily D Cranston, Michael R Thompson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Master 8 14%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 14%
Chemical Engineering 6 10%
Engineering 5 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 21 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2019.
All research outputs
#17,916,870
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Pharmaceutics
#6,699
of 8,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,694
of 371,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Pharmaceutics
#60
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,547 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.