| Title |
Ultra-Processed Diets Cause Excess Calorie Intake and Weight Gain: An Inpatient Randomized Controlled Trial of Ad Libitum Food Intake
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kevin D Hall, Alexis Ayuketah, Robert Brychta, Hongyi Cai, Thomas Cassimatis, Kong Y Chen, Stephanie T Chung, Elise Costa, Amber Courville, Valerie Darcey, Laura A Fletcher, Ciaran G Forde, Ahmed M Gharib, Juen Guo, Rebecca Howard, Paule V Joseph, Suzanne McGehee, Ronald Ouwerkerk, Klaudia Raisinger, Irene Rozga, Michael Stagliano, Mary Walter, Peter J Walter, Shanna Yang, Megan Zhou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,254 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 571 | 18% |
| Spain | 205 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 183 | 6% |
| Canada | 110 | 3% |
| Mexico | 104 | 3% |
| Australia | 56 | 2% |
| France | 48 | 1% |
| India | 44 | 1% |
| Argentina | 41 | 1% |
| Other | 506 | 16% |
| Unknown | 1386 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2285 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 462 | 14% |
| Scientists | 440 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 54 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,981 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1981 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 256 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 231 | 12% |
| Researcher | 221 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 199 | 10% |
| Other | 116 | 6% |
| Other | 288 | 15% |
| Unknown | 670 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 288 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 269 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 168 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 142 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 50 | 3% |
| Other | 293 | 15% |
| Unknown | 771 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6367. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#502
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#1
of 3,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6
of 366,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#1
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 76.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.