You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Radiogenomics Consortium Genome-Wide Association Study Meta-analysis of Late Toxicity after Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jnci/djz075 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah L Kerns, Laura Fachal, Leila Dorling, Gillian C Barnett, Andrea Baran, Derick R Peterson, Michelle Hollenberg, Ke Hao, Antonio Di Narzo, Mehmet Eren Ahsen, Gaurav Pandey, Søren M Bentzen, Michelle Janelsins, Rebecca M Elliott, Paul D P Pharoah, Neil G Burnet, David P Dearnaley, Sarah L Gulliford, Emma Hall, Matthew R Sydes, Miguel E Aguado-Barrera, Antonio Gómez-Caamaño, Ana M Carballo, Paula Peleteiro, Ramón Lobato-Busto, Richard Stock, Nelson N Stone, Harry Ostrer, Nawaid Usmani, Sandeep Singhal, Hiroshi Tsuji, Takashi Imai, Shiro Saito, Rosalind Eeles, Kim DeRuyck, Matthew Parliament, Alison M Dunning, Ana Vega, Barry S Rosenstein, Catharine M L West |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 14 | 38% |
| United States | 7 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 14% |
| Poland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 76% |
| Scientists | 5 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Researcher | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 25 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 28 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,450,439
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#920
of 7,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,106
of 365,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#17
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.