↓ Skip to main content

Genomic data mining for functional annotation of human long noncoding RNAs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Zhejiang University - Science B, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Genomic data mining for functional annotation of human long noncoding RNAs
Published in
Journal of Zhejiang University - Science B, May 2019
DOI 10.1631/jzus.b1900162
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian L. Gudenas, Jun Wang, Shu-zhen Kuang, An-qi Wei, Steven B. Cogill, Liang-jiang Wang

Abstract

Life may have begun in an RNA world, which is supported by increasing evidence of the vital role that RNAs perform in biological systems. In the human genome, most genes actually do not encode proteins; they are noncoding RNA genes. The largest class of noncoding genes is known as long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), which are transcripts greater in length than 200 nucleotides, but with no protein-coding capacity. While some lncRNAs have been demonstrated to be key regulators of gene expression and 3D genome organization, most lncRNAs are still uncharacterized. We thus propose several data mining and machine learning approaches for the functional annotation of human lncRNAs by leveraging the vast amount of data from genetic and genomic studies. Recent results from our studies and those of other groups indicate that genomic data mining can give insights into lncRNA functions and provide valuable information for experimental studies of candidate lncRNAs associated with human disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 11 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Computer Science 3 8%
Engineering 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2019.
All research outputs
#14,608,799
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Zhejiang University - Science B
#337
of 704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,825
of 365,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Zhejiang University - Science B
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.