| Title |
First-year medical students’ calibration bias and accuracy across clinical reasoning activities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Health Sciences Education, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10459-019-09897-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Timothy J. Cleary, Abigail Konopasky, Jeffrey S. La Rochelle, Brian E. Neubauer, Steven J. Durning, Anthony R. Artino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 42% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 42% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 21% |
| Unknown | 25 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 26 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,751,472
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#237
of 858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,739
of 351,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.