↓ Skip to main content

Textural Kinetics: A Novel Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE)-MRI Feature for Breast Lesion Classification

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Digital Imaging, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Textural Kinetics: A Novel Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE)-MRI Feature for Breast Lesion Classification
Published in
Journal of Digital Imaging, May 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10278-010-9298-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shannon C. Agner, Salil Soman, Edward Libfeld, Margie McDonald, Kathleen Thomas, Sarah Englander, Mark A. Rosen, Deanna Chin, John Nosher, Anant Madabhushi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 104 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 23%
Researcher 21 20%
Other 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 28 26%
Unknown 9 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 26%
Engineering 21 20%
Computer Science 20 19%
Physics and Astronomy 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 13 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,475,259
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Digital Imaging
#338
of 1,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,960
of 96,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Digital Imaging
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,050 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.