Title |
Pulsar candidate selection using ensemble networks for FAST drift-scan survey
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11433-018-9388-3 |
Authors |
HongFeng Wang, WeiWei Zhu, Ping Guo, Di Li, SiBo Feng, Qian Yin, ChenChen Miao, ZhenZhao Tao, ZhiChen Pan, Pei Wang, Xin Zheng, XiaoDan Deng, ZhiJie Liu, XiaoYao Xie, XuHong Yu, ShanPing You, Hui Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 24% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 12% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Researcher | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 6 | 35% |
Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 29% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Engineering | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,203,383
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy
#106
of 399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,825
of 355,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 399 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.