| Title |
Agreement between web-based and paper versions of a socio-demographic questionnaire in the NutriNet-Santé study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Public Health, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00038-011-0257-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne-Claire Vergnaud, Mathilde Touvier, Caroline Méjean, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Clothilde Pollet, Aurélie Malon, Katia Castetbon, Serge Hercberg |
| Abstract |
Web-based studies nowadays raise a major interest as they can improve all steps involved in observational studies. Our objective was to compare the web-based version of the NutriNet-Santé self-administered socio-demographic and economic questionnaire with the traditional paper version. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2014.
All research outputs
#15,983,535
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#1,263
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,406
of 122,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.