↓ Skip to main content

Comment on “Drinking Strategies: Planned Drinking Versus Drinking to Thirst”

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Comment on “Drinking Strategies: Planned Drinking Versus Drinking to Thirst”
Published in
Sports Medicine, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40279-018-1026-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin D. Hoffman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 40%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 2 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,180,114
of 23,148,322 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,622
of 2,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,705
of 437,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#28
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,148,322 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.