↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: A method of multi-criteria set recognition based on deep feature representation

Overview of attention for article published in Multimedia Tools and Applications, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: A method of multi-criteria set recognition based on deep feature representation
Published in
Multimedia Tools and Applications, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11042-017-5385-3
Authors

Caiyou Zhang, Hongzhen Yang, Xiaojun Shen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,357,610
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Multimedia Tools and Applications
#81
of 4,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,691
of 297,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Multimedia Tools and Applications
#3
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,321 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.