You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
秩父・武甲山論
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Bulletin of Kubikino Institute of Folk-Archive, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.32257/kfa.1.8_1 |
| Authors |
笹久保 伸 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 11 | 31% |
| Unknown | 25 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,280,306
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Bulletin of Kubikino Institute of Folk-Archive
#1
of 85 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,520
of 365,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Bulletin of Kubikino Institute of Folk-Archive
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.