| Title |
A cluster of disseminated small cortical lesions in MELAS: its distinctive clinical and neuroimaging features
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neurology, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00415-019-09283-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yu Hongo, Juntaro Kaneko, Hiroki Suga, Daisuke Ishima, Eiji Kitamura, Tsugio Akutsu, Yuya Onozawa, Naomi Kanazawa, Tomohide Goto, Kazutoshi Nishiyama, Takahiro Iizuka |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 21% |
| Unknown | 10 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2019.
All research outputs
#20,571,435
of 23,148,322 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#4,045
of 4,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,721
of 351,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#75
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,148,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.