You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mometasone or Tiotropium in Mild Asthma with a Low Sputum Eosinophil Level
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1814917 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen C Lazarus, Jerry A Krishnan, Tonya S King, Jason E Lang, Kathryn V Blake, Ronina Covar, Njira Lugogo, Sally Wenzel, Vernon M Chinchilli, David T Mauger, Anne-Marie Dyer, Homer A Boushey, John V Fahy, Prescott G Woodruff, Leonard B Bacharier, Michael D Cabana, Juan C Cardet, Mario Castro, James Chmiel, Loren Denlinger, Emily DiMango, Anne M Fitzpatrick, Deborah Gentile, Annette Hastie, Fernando Holguin, Elliot Israel, Daniel Jackson, Monica Kraft, Craig LaForce, Robert F Lemanske, Fernando D Martinez, Wendy Moore, Wayne J Morgan, James N Moy, Ross Myers, Stephen P Peters, Wanda Phipatanakul, Jacqueline A Pongracic, Loretta Que, Kristie Ross, Lewis Smith, Stanley J Szefler, Michael E Wechsler, Christine A Sorkness |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 135 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 34 | 25% |
| Spain | 11 | 8% |
| Mexico | 5 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Australia | 4 | 3% |
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 46 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 95 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 14% |
| Scientists | 19 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 177 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Researcher | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 23% |
| Unknown | 48 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 44% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 53 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 579. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2022.
All research outputs
#40,347
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#1,450
of 32,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#791
of 365,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#27
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.